Skip to main content

City Drought, Country Drought

About a week after the big rain we had in early February, the peepers (tree frogs) started singing at our pond here at home.  I went out after sundown and recorded the sound on my iPhone.   For me, their song indicated that we'd finally received some relief from our dry conditions.  At least 3 other farmers of my acquaintance posted audio recordings of the peepers singing at their farms that week on Facebook.  All of us, it seemed, were relieved to hear the frogs.

This week, a friend of mine received a call from a very distraught woman who lives in a posh subdivision in our county.  The frogs in the water feature in her landscaping, it seems, were bothersome - they were even keeping her awake at night.  She asked for help in ridding her "pond" of frogs.

These differing perspectives on the return of the tree frogs, for me, incapsulate the difference in our state's response to this drought.  California is both the most populous state in the country and the leading agricultural state - a dichotomy that plays out in our water policy.  I've written previously about my annoyance when TV or radio "meteorologists" talk about beautiful (aka, sunny) weather during a dry winter.  Some time in January, I noticed, these prognosticators started realizing that our "beautiful" weather was a problem.

Another example of this disconnect: our local water agencies serve both agricultural and urban customers.  One agency calls itself an irrigation district; the other calls itself a water agency.  At a board meeting last month, the water agency decided that swimming pools were "commercial" water users - just like farms.  While I can certainly appreciate the economic impacts of reducing or eliminating water for swimming pools, I have a difficult putting these impacts in the same category as reducing our ability to produce food.  This perspective, it seems to me, is incredibly urban.

Since we direct-market some of what we raise, I have a regular opportunity to talk to my suburban and urban customers about the impacts of this drought on our business - and on our community's ability to produce its own food.  For those of us in the "country," this drought has meant that we're selling animals, or deciding which part of our orchards we'd let die.  For those of us in the "city", I'm afraid, the drought has meant that we're thinking about not watering our lawns as frequently.  To help bridge this divide, I've recently launched a Facebook page called Farmer and Rancher Voices from the Drought.  This page, I hope, is a place where we can talk about the impacts of the drought on our farms and ranches - and on our larger communities.  I hope you'll check it out!


  1. As we move into summer, the difference between the impact of the drought between city and country has become even more pronounced. I've had well-intentioned folks tell me that they've been terribly impacted by the closure of water parks in the City of Rocklin. I was amazed today to see fountains running in the City of Roseville. In the meantime, farmers are deciding which fields to leave fallow and which trees to let die. It's almost surreal!


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Trade Offs

As we were building fence for the soon-to-be-lambing ewes this morning, someone drove by and asked my partner Roger how long it took to set up the electro-net fencing we use for the sheep. Roger replied, "It's not too bad," to which the driver said, "Seems like a lot of work." Roger's answer - which both of us use with some frequency, was, "Yeah - but this way we don't have to feed any hay!" The driver, who obviously wasn't a rancher, didn't understand - and I suspect even some of my rancher friends don't understand the trade off we're making. Building electric fence is a lot of work - wouldn't it be easier just to feed hay?

The paddock that Roger and I built this morning encloses about 5.75 acres of high quality forage. Since the ewes are on the verge of lambing, their forage demand is peaking. They're eating nearly twice as much grass now as they need in the late summer - after all, many of them eating for three (and p…

No Easy Answers Part 2

In mid October, some friends who graze their cattle in the mountains of western Lassen County (less than 200 miles from our home), became the first ranchers to have cattle “officially” killed by wolves in California in nearly a century. Wildlife officials confirmed that the Lassen pack killed a 600-pound heifer; four more heifers died (and were partially eaten by wolves), but the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) couldn’t confirm the cause of death. While I learned about the depredations shortly after they happened through the rancher grapevine, news of my friends’ losses weren’t made public until the California Cattlemen’s Association and California Farm Bureau Federation issued a joint press release this week. The October 28 edition of the Sacramento Bee ran the story.
If you’ve read my previous blogs about wolves, you’ll probably know that I’ve frequently been frustrated with the Bee’s coverage. The paper has run guest opinions disguised as news articles, and appar…

Humbled and Excited

More than 20 years ago, I went to work for the California Cattlemen's Association (CCA). After two internships, I'd been hired by my friend and mentor John Braly as the membership director in 1992. By 1996, I'd been promoted to assistant vice president - pretty heady stuff for a young guy who hadn't grown up in the industry. I started looking for new challenges. Dr. Jim Oltjen, who was (and is) the beef extension specialist at UC Davis (my undergraduate alma mater) suggested that I think about going to graduate school to prepare for a career in extension. I considered it, but the timing wasn't right.

Fast forward to 2013 (or so) - I'd been working as a part-time community education specialist in our local University of California Cooperative Extension (UCCE) office for several years. The farm advisors in the office - Roger Ingram and Cindy Fake - suggested that I consider getting a master's degree and applying for a future farm advisor job. This time the id…