Skip to main content

Organic: To Be or Not To Be (With Apologies to Hamlet)

Occasionally, a customer (or potential customer) will ask whether our grass-fed lamb is organic.  In nearly every case, the customer will make a purchase after I explain our reasons for not being certified organic.  Because we're able to sell directly to our customers (usually with face-to-face contact), organic certification has not been advantageous for us.  For me, there are both practical and philosophical reasons not to become certified.

First, the practical (and perhaps economic) reasons....

We currently raise nearly 200 sheep (with plans to expand this number to more than 400 ewes).  We own (along with our bank) just 3 acres, which means we rely almost entirely on rented pasture and contract grazing.  This year, we are leasing property from at least 6 different landowners.  We'll be getting paid to graze on at least 5 additional properties, each with yet another landowner.  For us to certify our live animals as organic, we'd not only need to certify our husbandry practices - we'd also need to work with our landlords and our grazing customers to certify their land.  In other words, we'd need to obtain organic certification on 11 separate properties (with separate owners) in order to call our live lambs "organic."  For our landlords and grazing customers, this would be an unnecessary expense; for us, it would be an undesirable expense (largely for the following reason).

To call our meat "organic," we would need to have our lambs processed in a certified organic processing facility.  Given the current meat inspection environmental health rules, we must have our meat processed in a USDA-inspected plant, of which there are limited options in Northern California.  Our current processing partner is Superior Farms in Dixon.  Despite the fact that we are a very small fish in their big pond (they process more lambs in a day than we'll process all year), they do an outstanding job for us.  Our lambs are handled humanely (just like we'd handle them), and our meat is processed with care and quality.  Superior is not, however, organically certified (and neither are the other facilities we might use) - there is not an economic advantage for them to go to the expense of certification for my 250 lambs this year.  Even if we had our production practices and land certified, we would not be able to put the "O" word on our meat label.

These practical barriers are related to the philosophical barrier that exists in my mind.  To me, many of our food processing and marketing rules are designed to facilitate a food system where farmers and consumers don't need to know one another directly.  In other words, these regulations (including the National Organic Program) exist to maintain the anonymity of farmers and eaters.  Perhaps this is necessary for a system that is large enough to feed 300 million people, but the regulatory system seems to favor very large producers and processors.  If you're buying lamb at the grocery store without any connection to the farm or farmer who raised it, I suppose it's reassuring to know that a trained inspector approved it or that a third party certified the production practices used by the farmer.  I'd rather look the farmer in the eye and ask him or her how their food was produced.

Perhaps these thoughts sound like a rationalization on my part for not becoming certified organic, but let me explain our production system.  Our lambs are 100 percent grass-fed - they consume nothing except their mother's milk, grass, and some extra minerals.  We do vaccinate our lambs and ewes against the diseases that are common in our region, but we observe (and go beyond) all of the label restrictions on these vaccines.  We feel like we have a responsibility to our animals AND to our customers to raise happy, healthy sheep.

How do our customers know that we're accurately representing our products?  That's the key, the reason that a third party verification system was created, right?  I think this is the beauty of a smaller-scale, community-based direct market system.  During parts of the year, my customers drive past my sheep on their way to the farmers' market.  At all times of the year, we welcome visitors to our farm.  In other words, our production practices are entirely open for our customers to see.  If you don't count the trip to the processor (which is just 65 miles from Auburn), our meat is usually consumed within 25 miles of where we raise our animals.  The key, then is a local, transparent farming and food system.  Eating local won't solve all of our food safety issues, but knowing our farmers (and as farmers, knowing our eaters) is a huge step in the right direction.


Wordle: Organic

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trade Offs

As we were building fence for the soon-to-be-lambing ewes this morning, someone drove by and asked my partner Roger how long it took to set up the electro-net fencing we use for the sheep. Roger replied, "It's not too bad," to which the driver said, "Seems like a lot of work." Roger's answer - which both of us use with some frequency, was, "Yeah - but this way we don't have to feed any hay!" The driver, who obviously wasn't a rancher, didn't understand - and I suspect even some of my rancher friends don't understand the trade off we're making. Building electric fence is a lot of work - wouldn't it be easier just to feed hay?

The paddock that Roger and I built this morning encloses about 5.75 acres of high quality forage. Since the ewes are on the verge of lambing, their forage demand is peaking. They're eating nearly twice as much grass now as they need in the late summer - after all, many of them eating for three (and p…

No Easy Answers Part 2

In mid October, some friends who graze their cattle in the mountains of western Lassen County (less than 200 miles from our home), became the first ranchers to have cattle “officially” killed by wolves in California in nearly a century. Wildlife officials confirmed that the Lassen pack killed a 600-pound heifer; four more heifers died (and were partially eaten by wolves), but the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) couldn’t confirm the cause of death. While I learned about the depredations shortly after they happened through the rancher grapevine, news of my friends’ losses weren’t made public until the California Cattlemen’s Association and California Farm Bureau Federation issued a joint press release this week. The October 28 edition of the Sacramento Bee ran the story.
If you’ve read my previous blogs about wolves, you’ll probably know that I’ve frequently been frustrated with the Bee’s coverage. The paper has run guest opinions disguised as news articles, and appar…

Humbled and Excited

More than 20 years ago, I went to work for the California Cattlemen's Association (CCA). After two internships, I'd been hired by my friend and mentor John Braly as the membership director in 1992. By 1996, I'd been promoted to assistant vice president - pretty heady stuff for a young guy who hadn't grown up in the industry. I started looking for new challenges. Dr. Jim Oltjen, who was (and is) the beef extension specialist at UC Davis (my undergraduate alma mater) suggested that I think about going to graduate school to prepare for a career in extension. I considered it, but the timing wasn't right.

Fast forward to 2013 (or so) - I'd been working as a part-time community education specialist in our local University of California Cooperative Extension (UCCE) office for several years. The farm advisors in the office - Roger Ingram and Cindy Fake - suggested that I consider getting a master's degree and applying for a future farm advisor job. This time the id…