Skip to main content


I'm sure every profession has its share of frustrating circumstances.  One of the more frustrating aspects of selling meat directly to our customers is the fact that we have to rely on others to process our product.  Thanks to federal rules, we have to have our beef, lamb and goat processed at a USDA-inspected facility if we want to sell individual cuts of meat to our farmers' market customers.  We currently work with two processors - one in Dixon and one in Reno.  Both are great to work with - they've both gone out of their way to help us be successful.

Occasionally, however, this relationship hits a bump.  Sometimes we get our product back with the wrong label or the wrong price.  Sometimes we're missing specific cuts of meat.  Today, we're unable to pick up a load of meat because our processor is short-handed and overwhelmed with work.  I know our processors are frustrated  at times by the challenges of working with small scale producers like us, too.

I'm not sure what the answer is.  I certainly have neither the time nor the expertise to butcher our own meat.  While I'm committed to selling our product locally, I sometimes wonder whether our lives would be easier if we simply sold our live lambs to a processor and focused our energy on product rather than meat sales and marketing.  Ultimately, I believe that we are most successful (economically and otherwise) when we market what we raise to our community.  I just wish our community was more self-sufficient in terms of processing.


  1. I heard a story on NPR about mobile FDA processors. I don't think that they exist in California but wouldn't that be great! I am sorry that you are unable to continue to raise the chickens. It almost seems like a conspiracy to put up road blocks to small farmers and keep us from having healthy, sustainably raised food.

  2. There is a mobile USDA-inspected slaughter facility on the Central Coast. Unfortunately, it's sitting idle - USDA has required the farmers who want to use it to make expensive on-farm improvements. It also requires a local USDA-inspected cut-and-wrap facility - which we don't have in our area.

    Farmers and eaters need to band together to demand changes in this system. Policy makers won't listen to small farmers alone, but they will listen to consumers. Thanks for your comment!


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Trade Offs

As we were building fence for the soon-to-be-lambing ewes this morning, someone drove by and asked my partner Roger how long it took to set up the electro-net fencing we use for the sheep. Roger replied, "It's not too bad," to which the driver said, "Seems like a lot of work." Roger's answer - which both of us use with some frequency, was, "Yeah - but this way we don't have to feed any hay!" The driver, who obviously wasn't a rancher, didn't understand - and I suspect even some of my rancher friends don't understand the trade off we're making. Building electric fence is a lot of work - wouldn't it be easier just to feed hay?

The paddock that Roger and I built this morning encloses about 5.75 acres of high quality forage. Since the ewes are on the verge of lambing, their forage demand is peaking. They're eating nearly twice as much grass now as they need in the late summer - after all, many of them eating for three (and p…

No Easy Answers Part 2

In mid October, some friends who graze their cattle in the mountains of western Lassen County (less than 200 miles from our home), became the first ranchers to have cattle “officially” killed by wolves in California in nearly a century. Wildlife officials confirmed that the Lassen pack killed a 600-pound heifer; four more heifers died (and were partially eaten by wolves), but the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) couldn’t confirm the cause of death. While I learned about the depredations shortly after they happened through the rancher grapevine, news of my friends’ losses weren’t made public until the California Cattlemen’s Association and California Farm Bureau Federation issued a joint press release this week. The October 28 edition of the Sacramento Bee ran the story.
If you’ve read my previous blogs about wolves, you’ll probably know that I’ve frequently been frustrated with the Bee’s coverage. The paper has run guest opinions disguised as news articles, and appar…

Humbled and Excited

More than 20 years ago, I went to work for the California Cattlemen's Association (CCA). After two internships, I'd been hired by my friend and mentor John Braly as the membership director in 1992. By 1996, I'd been promoted to assistant vice president - pretty heady stuff for a young guy who hadn't grown up in the industry. I started looking for new challenges. Dr. Jim Oltjen, who was (and is) the beef extension specialist at UC Davis (my undergraduate alma mater) suggested that I think about going to graduate school to prepare for a career in extension. I considered it, but the timing wasn't right.

Fast forward to 2013 (or so) - I'd been working as a part-time community education specialist in our local University of California Cooperative Extension (UCCE) office for several years. The farm advisors in the office - Roger Ingram and Cindy Fake - suggested that I consider getting a master's degree and applying for a future farm advisor job. This time the id…